11 C
Melbourne
Sunday, September 29, 2024

Trending Talks

spot_img

Is AI coming for your job? Statistically, I am at risk

[ad_1]

A lot of the grunt work done by lawyers or even scientists could be removed by AI – allowing time for higher-order tasks to be done by education professionals.

Loading

Indeed, there are other studies on disruptive effects of AI in the labour market that suggest that within the white-collar space, the higher the education, the safer the worker.

Jarden’s research, however, found a strong correlation between higher paid workers and the level of disruption.

Similarly, a just-released paper on the topic by the IMF notes that “even high-skill occupations, which were previously considered immune to automation because of their complexity and reliance on deep expertise, now face potential disruption”.

So it’s more nuanced than the division between sedentary and active workers. No one, for example, is contemplating that there will be any judges on those unemployment queues, but they are expected to become more productive using AI.

It is productivity which is at the heart of why companies (and therefore stock markets) are excited about AI and why governments are salivating at the prospect it could radically improve GDP.

And it explains why when the government released its first attempt at defining regulation around AI it barely made a dent.

The government’s response to safe AI regulation issued this week acknowledged some of the threats posed by AI, but at the same time estimated that adopting AI and automation could add an additional $170 billion to $600 billion a year to Australia’s GDP by 2030.

That’s a lot of reasons to take a regulation-lite approach – much the same way that the US has dealt with balancing AI’s threat and opportunity.

Loading

Australia has little by way of companies like Nvidia and Microsoft in the US that are involved directly in the roll-out of AI.

But as Jarden points out, there are particular businesses here that could be positively impacted by the first wave of adoption, citing companies such as Brambles, Telstra, Orica and Goodman Group. Those Jarden sees negatively affected include Flight Centre, Helloworld and software group Altium.

The downside is that those that adopt the technology earlier are more exposed to an initial hit to their earnings as it will require additional investment spending.

There is little debate among experts that many jobs will disappear. Just how many remains to be seen.

The Market Recap newsletter is a wrap of the day’s trading. Get it each weekday afternoon.

[ad_2]

Source link

Serendib News
Serendib News
Serendib News is a renowned multicultural web portal with a 17-year commitment to providing free, diverse, and multilingual print newspapers, featuring over 1000 published stories that cater to multicultural communities.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles