Hirunika Premachandra, a former Colombo district Parliamentarian, is set to seek bail after being sentenced to three years in prison by the High Court of Colombo. Her conviction stems from her involvement in the abduction of a youth using a Defender vehicle, a case that has garnered significant public and media attention.
President’s Counsel Anura Meddegoda, representing Premachandra, announced to the Colombo High Court that the defense intends to file for bail pending appeal. This legal move aims to secure Premachandra’s release while her appeal against the conviction is under consideration.
Under Section 20(2) of the Bail Act (No. 30 of 1997), the defense has the right to request bail for an accused individual when an appeal has been filed against their conviction. This provision is intended to ensure that the accused can remain free during the appeal process, provided that the court finds the request justified.
The case against Premachandra has been a focal point in Sri Lankan politics, highlighting issues of legal accountability and the use of political influence. As the defense prepares to submit the bail application, legal experts and the public alike are keenly watching the proceedings.
If granted, the bail will allow Premachandra to continue her life outside of prison while the legal process unfolds. However, the decision rests with the Colombo High Court, which will consider various factors, including the nature of the offense, the likelihood of the appeal’s success, and any potential risks associated with granting bail.
This development marks another significant chapter in the ongoing legal saga involving Hirunika Premachandra. The outcome of the bail request will have implications not only for Premachandra but also for the broader political and legal landscape in Sri Lanka.
